Plural Reality · AI for pre-deliberation reflection

Know where your group stands before the discussion begins

Cartographer (Baisoku Kaigi) is Plural Reality's tool for the moment before people deliberate. An AI asks each participant questions so they can put their own views, reasons and open questions into words. Cartographer then maps where the group agrees, where it is divided, and what people are not yet sure about.

Free to use for now. Hosts sign in with their email address, no password needed.

Participant screen: a statement about a park redesign with five answer buttons from strongly agree to strongly disagree
Demo session with fictional sample responses.

Featured in research

An example in DemocracyNext's Deliberative Muscles & AI

DemocracyNext's paper Deliberative Muscles & AI (July 2026) features Plural Reality's Cartographer as an example of a complementary use of AI for self-reflection: structured pre-deliberation prompts that ask participants to articulate their own values.

The paper describes how the tool has been used in deliberative processes in Japan. After an expert presentation and before small-group deliberation, assembly members first use Cartographer individually to reflect on what they think and what they do not yet understand. The outputs are then reviewed together on a big screen at each table.

Read the paper (PDF, see pages 7 and 22–24)

How Cartographer works

1. Each participant puts their view into words

Participants rate AI-generated statements on the topic, from strongly agree to strongly disagree. When they are not sure, the AI drafts positions they can start from, or they answer in their own words. Participants do not need an account.

Participant screen after choosing not sure: the AI drafts positions the participant can start from
Demo session with fictional sample responses.

2. The group sees where it stands

The agreement map places every statement on one axis from “everyone disagrees” to “everyone agrees”, and lists the most divisive statements, those with the most “not sure” answers, and the most settled ones. The discussion can start from what actually needs discussing.

Agreement map: every statement on one axis from everyone disagrees to everyone agrees, with the most divisive, most not-sure and most settled statements
Demo session with fictional sample responses.

3. Groups of views become visible

The opinion map places participants by the similarity of their views and labels the groups it finds. Names stay hidden unless the host chooses to show them.

Opinion map: participants placed by similarity of their views in two AI-labelled groups, names hidden
Demo session with fictional sample responses.

Reports for the host and for every participant

Analysis report for the host

An AI-written report on the areas of agreement, disagreement and uncertainty, surprising findings, and the groups of views.

Host view: the AI analysis report with areas of agreement, disagreement and uncertainty
Demo session with fictional sample responses.

Personal report for each participant

Each participant gets a short AI-written reflection on their own answers, to bring into the conversation.

A participant's personal report reflecting on their own answers
Demo session with fictional sample responses.

Run a session from one dashboard

  • Share a participation link or QR code with the group.
  • Follow each participant's progress as they answer.
  • Review every response and export the responses as CSV.
  • The participant and host screens are available in English.
Host dashboard with participant progress, the participation link and QR code, and session settings
Demo session with fictional sample responses.

Where it has been used

Cartographer has been used in public deliberation and inside companies in Japan. Plural Reality publishes case studies on its website.

Read the case studies

Try Cartographer with your next group

Start a session yourself, or tell us about your process and we will show you how Cartographer could fit.

Questions about Plural Reality? Contact us